Well, I feel as though I have spent an age working on the three paragraphs I have written for my artist’s statement. The last post on this got me so far, but I still didn’t think that it truly described by work. I have been surprised, however, at how difficult it has been to write this when the body of work is so well advanced. It is almost as though the work has had a mind of itself and I have been playing catch up trying to describe it. The positive aspect of this struggle has been that I feel that the work is quite multi-layered and open to different interpretations therefore the statement had to point towards my intentions without leading the viewer too much.
I had also got it in to my mind not to use the word ‘I’ as I was worried that this would push the work back towards a Modernist approach which isn’t what I wanted to achieve. However, I have now come to realise that this is ok as long as I am using this personal perspective to reflect a common concern rather than my own agenda.
Another feature that has helped me to develop this statement, but which has also meant that it has taken me quite sometime, is that I have tried to closely connect this statement with the theme of my major essay for Contextual Studies. I felt it important that I fully understood the focus of my body of work so that I could use this as the focus of my essay too. I am glad to say that this artist statement has helped to create the structure of my major essay as well as the introductory text to it.
The other point to raise is that while I was in the doldrums over this, it was through an e-mail conversation with a fellow student that rejuvenated my efforts to get me to this stage – thanks Stan is the phrase I need to say.
I am therefore now pleased to announce that I am quite happy with this statement and I feel that it really works with the images. It certainly helps me when I go through the photographs so I am hopeful that it would be just as supportive for others. I sense that the key words are at the end “It leaves open the question of whether this change is good or a threat to the way things were.”
For now, I intend to leave this statement open for a while. I will come back to it later but hopefully I will still feel quite happy with it then as I do just now:
Lost Opportunities
This body of work investigates how changes of time, place and society can affect a person’s relationship with the land and place it forms. It does so by comparing a Council estate in West Yorkshire where I grew up, with a more cosmopolitan area of Glasgow where I have just moved to.
Looking back at the Council estate, I recall ordinary places that became significant due to my engagement with them, and then reimagine a childhood paradise where I was free to engage with the land oblivious of the threat to this utopia from adulthood and society. In Glasgow, I sought out similar opportunities for engaging with both the land and place to understand their potential of becoming significant to me and whether the notion of a childhood paradise could still exist today.
The intention is to use personal experience to reflect on the ways in which society’s relationship with land and place has changed over time, and to consider the reasons for this. It leaves open the question of whether this change is good or a threat to the way things were.